Power flow data for 39 bus New England system. Please see caseformat for
details on the case file format.
Data taken from [1] with the following modifications/additions:
-
renumbered gen buses consecutively (as in [2] and [4])
-
added
Pmin = 0 for all gens
-
added
Qmin , Qmax for gens at 31 & 39
(copied from gen at 35)
-
added
Vg based on V in bus data (missing
for bus 39)
-
added
Vg, Pg, Pd, Qd at bus 39 from [2] (same in [4])
-
added
Pmax at bus 39: Pmax = Pg + 100
-
added line flow limits and area data from [4]
-
added voltage limits,
Vmax = 1.06, Vmin = 0.94
-
added identical quadratic generator costs
-
increased
Pmax for gen at bus 34 from 308 to 508
(assumed typo in [1], makes initial solved case feasible)
-
re-solved power flow
Notes:
-
Bus 39, its generator and 2 connecting lines were added (by authors
of [1]) to represent the interconnection with the rest of the eastern
interconnect, and did not include
Vg, Pg, Qg, Pd, Qd, Pmin,
Pmax, Qmin or Qmax .
-
As the swing bus, bus 31 did not include and Q limits.
-
The voltages, etc in [1] appear to be quite close to the power flow
solution of the case before adding bus 39 with it's generator and
connecting branches, though the solution is not exact.
-
Explicit voltage setpoints for gen buses are not given, so they are
taken from the bus data, however this results in two binding Q limits
at buses 34 & 37, so the corresponding voltages have probably
deviated from their original setpoints.
-
The generator locations and types are as follows:
-
1 30 hydro
-
2 31 nuke01
-
3 32 nuke02
-
4 33 fossil02
-
5 34 fossil01
-
6 35 nuke03
-
7 36 fossil04
-
8 37 nuke04
-
9 38 nuke05
-
10 39 interconnection to rest of US/Canada
This is a solved power flow case, but it includes the following
violations:
-
Pmax violated at bus 31: Pg = 677.87, Pmax =
646
-
Qmin violated at bus 37: Qg = -1.37, Qmin =
0
References:
[1] G. W. Bills, et.al., "On-Line Stability Analysis
Study" RP90-1 Report for the Edison Electric Institute, October
12, 1970, pp. 1-20 - 1-35. prepared by
-
E. M. Gulachenski - New England Electric System
-
J. M. Undrill - General Electric Co.
"...generally representative of the New England 345 KV system,
but is not an exact or complete model of any past, present or projected
configuration of the actual New England 345 KV system."
[2] M. A. Pai, Energy Function Analysis for Power System
Stability, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1989. (references [3]
as source of data)
[3] Athay, T.; Podmore, R.; Virmani, S., "A Practical Method
for the Direct Analysis of Transient Stability," IEEE
Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , vol.PAS-98, no.2,
pp.573-584, March 1979. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4113518&isnumber=4113486
(references [1] as source of data)
[4] Data included with TC Calculator at http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/tcc/ for 39-bus
system.
- Returns:
- Power flow data for 39 bus New England system.
|